Scientists presents Proof of Intelligent Design ! Charles Darwin – Origin of Species – Evolution Disproved, Refuted by Biologists and Scientists from Cambridge, Chicago, Munich universities ! Creation proved by Scientists ! Part 3 / 7

20 04 2011

Intelligent Design proved by – Biologists, Scientists from Cambridge, Chicago, Munchen – debating and refuting Evolution Theory ! Scientists presents Proof of Intelligent Design ! Charles Darwin – Origin of Species – Disproved, Refuted by Biologists and Scientists ! Creation proved by Scientists ! Please watch all parts of this movie: Part 1: http://www.youtube.com Part 2: http://www.youtube.com Part 3: http://www.youtube.com Part 4: http://www.youtube.com Part 5: http://www.youtube.com Part 6: http://www.youtube.com Part 7: http://www.youtube.com Thank you for watching ! Tags: % can science prove that evolution in wrong? %* can science prove Existence of God? New York Times can science prove the the – universe was created? () (_)can science prove creation? can science disprove God? can science disprove creation? can science disprove evolution? Who created the universe? % What created the universe? How did everything begin? How did everything start? Is there a God who created the earth? Is there a God who created the universe? Do we %_ -,- % know everything about evolution? Tags (-): Do we know everything about creation? %* Is there a proof of creation? % Is there anybody out there? Is the truth is out there? Can we rely on science . regarding the evolution? Can we rely on Bible regarding the creation? Can we understand the creation of all things? ^*%$ Can we understand the evolution of all things?

web design
by ocjess

HELLO U GUYS!!!! I HOPE UR DOING GREAT! WE WILL B WORKING ON A COLORFUL NAIL ART DESIGN. ITS EASY TO DO, I WILL TAKE U STEP BY STEP. THIS MANICURE IS A LITTLE CRAZY, BUT IT IS SUPER FUN~ I WANT TO GIVE MARIO PIMENTEL A SPECIAL THANK’S FOR ALLOWING ME TO USE HIS MUSIC ON MY BACKGROUND. UR AWESOME! THANK U!!!!!Disclaimer: I have no affiliation to any of the company brands I mention in this video. I have not received any of the products used in this video for free. I will get no monitary compensation for mentioning any of the products used in this video. WELL, I HOPE U ENJOY YOUR WEEKEND, & I WILL CU MONDAY WITH OUR 1st WEEKLY CONTEST QUESTION, B SAFE , BYE*
Video Rating: 4 / 5


Actions

Information

50 responses

20 04 2011
DanieltheSkeptic

@Serouisly
It is easy to say, you’ve spent “innumerable amounts of time” searching for a counter, but define “innumerable” because unless you are grossly exaggerating, you are suggesting that you’ve spent more time than a human can live on trying to find an argument (not proof, or empirical evidence, an argument) against irreducible complexity.

20 04 2011
DanieltheSkeptic

@Serouisly
Also, arguments don’t equal evidence. Irreducible complexity is scientifically inaccurate. What ID advocates say about the Eye is false. ID advocates only have arguments. They assume that because something is so complex that there must be a designer. That’s the argument from ignorance. That because THEY personally, can’t explain it, it must have been god/a designer. Get material empirical evidence for irreducible complexity then submit it to the scientific community.

20 04 2011
DanieltheSkeptic

@Serouisly
Evolution can’t be disproved or refuted as ID advocates claim. Do you know why? Because it is a theory. In Science, a Theory is by default correct. A theory isn’t proven right. It remains accepted until another theory overrides the previous. This is because in order for it to become a Theory, it needs to be proven, so if another explanation is also proven but explains and proves more, it assimilates the previous.

20 04 2011
DanieltheSkeptic

@Serouisly
Which Scientists? Any Scientist, specifically a Biologist who advocates Intelligent Design is fraudalent and most likely got their degree from a fraudalent, or unaccredited university. Evolution makes Biology, essentially Biology. In order for Intelligent Design to be true, it would literally have to explain everything Evolution explains (with material, empirical evidence, that is repeatable and must be made public) and explain what Evolution couldn’t.

20 04 2011
Serouisly

@DanieltheSkeptic These scientists have more credibility than the lower evolution advocates…

20 04 2011
Serouisly

@JuiceBoxheero o really… show me the video maybe? If I did research on my own Id have to spend innumerable amounts of time searching for a counter that doesnt exist or doesnt supply well enough to counter irreducible complexity

20 04 2011
speedkills4life

plant life need bees to pollenate flowers plants breath in carbon dioxide and breath out air and we breath in air and breath out carbon dioxide. and when tree’s die they rots and give the soil nutrients. What a Quintessences. How could this evolve by chance?Where does DNA get its intelligence from?It blatantly obvious that some one created it, some one had to of thought of that.

20 04 2011
speedkills4life

you can disprove evolution in many ways 1000s.

20 04 2011
Grettgirl

Point taken of the word “Theory”. Okay but that set-a-side, what about addressing their arguements they present in this short clip & others. That’s where I really want 2 focus. Many of their arguements make me question things I’ve learning about evolution. Many are valid agruements. I’m reading Evolution: A Theory In Crisis & DARWIN’S BLACK BOX: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution. Both honestly bring up good points that are ignored and avoided by evolutionist. Makes me want 2 dig deeper.

20 04 2011
JuiceBoxheero

spamming scripture at the start of the video doesn’t help your argument. And do some research on your own and you will see that evolutionists have addressed the issue of irreducible complexity.

20 04 2011
DanieltheSkeptic

@Grettgirl
My purpose of replying to you is to sincerely show you why “evolutionists” insult Intelligent Design advocates. And here are the reasons. 1) They constantly claim to be intelligent but misuse the words theory and science and constantly show their ignorance on the Scientific Method, by assuming that something is a Science without being able to test it’s premise. 2) Biologists and Evolution advocates understand that the Designer in ID is the same as God because both are unfalsifiable.

20 04 2011
DanieltheSkeptic

@Grettgirl
ID is not a hypothesis, because a hypothesis in Science is defined as an explanation that can be tested. How can you test for the existence of a designer while removing the possibility of other explanations? Saying that something is so complex that it must have had a designer is not testing, nor is it evidence. It’s the argument from ignorance IE: that since you can’t explain it, you default to an explanation that personally seems appealing, rather than saying you don’t know.

20 04 2011
DanieltheSkeptic

@Grettgirl
If you sincerely believe ID has any weight at all, then please understand what a Theory in Science means. A theory cannot be proven right, by default it is right. It is accepted until another theory that explains everything the previous theory did and the things it didn’t, with greater evidence. ID is not a theory, because if it were, then that means it has been tested (that a designer exists) in a laboratory setting, has been peer reviewed and has empirical evidence for it.

20 04 2011
DanieltheSkeptic

@Grettgirl
There’s a reason why people who have accepted Evolution tend to call ID supporters stupid. And the reason is because they prove their ignorance every time they use the word ‘theory’ in conjecture with ID and call it Science. Intelligent Design is not Science. It’s not even a hypothesis. Why? Because the very premise of ID’s claim is that there is a designer, which is not any different from a god, therefore, can’t even be testable and thus does not meet the requirements for science.

20 04 2011
Jessewb

@kitchenaut
If God is out of space-time, I’d love for you to explain to me what complexity is in that context, if you haven’t even got time and space required for mechanical complexity as supposed, then the conjecture of complexity is merely one derived from natural intuition and carries no weight whatsoever.
Btw, what is a quantum fluctuation? If you can’t tell me what it is physically, then again you’ve said nothing, if my God were only quantum fluctuations, then i’d have no issues with that.

20 04 2011
ArcanaKnight

@Grettgirl Specifically which “things in the theory of ID” bring Evo into question for you? If you have specific questions, why not ask them directly?

20 04 2011
kitchenaut

The mutations leading to a flagellum are selected for in increments.

20 04 2011
kitchenaut

@Jessewb

The teleological argument for God fails on the basis of special pleading. If causes can be self-caused, then why just one particular type? We have a known acausal phenomenon in quantum mechanics, where something can come from nothing, but is simple quantum fluctuation. The God hypothesis is necessarily complex, because a creator of the universe cannot be a simple, singular event. It postulates a complex mind-complex able to concieve of the universe, which raises more questions.

20 04 2011
Grettgirl

Part I: How come people are not intelligently addressing what’s presented? It shows lack of intelligence 2 personally attack instead of addressing some of these claims. As one who’s searching, I find it much more convincing 2 listen 2 intelligent ideas than 2 listen 2 personal attacks. In politics, politicians fall back on personal attacks when they’re cornered or can’t defend their positions. Is it the same 4 science? It seems that the debates on ID and Evo seem to follow that pattern.

20 04 2011
Grettgirl

Part I: How come people are not intelligently addressing what was presented? It shows lack of intelligence 2 personally attack instead of addressing some of these claims. As one who’s searching, I find it much more convincing 2 listen 2 intelligent ideas than 2 listen 2 personal attacks. In politics, politicians fall back on personal attacks when they’re cornered or can’t defend their positions. Is it the same 4 science? It seems that the debates on ID and Evo seem to follow that pattern

20 04 2011
Grettgirl

Part I: How come people are not intelligently addressing what was presented? It shows lack of intelligence 2 personally attack instead of addressing some of these claims. As one who’s searching, I find it much more convincing 2 listen 2 intelligent ideas than 2 listen 2 personal attacks. In politics, politicians fall back on personal attacks when they’re cornered or can’t defend their positions. Is it the same 4 science? It seems that the debates on ID and Evo seem to follow that pattern

20 04 2011
Grettgirl

Part II: So far I’ve mainly seen the person attacks come from the evolution side. I want 2 find good arguments against the intelligent design theory but so far I’ve just come across people who want to personally attack the belief without intelligently arguing or addressing what’s being presented. There are some things in the theory of ID that bring Evo into questions for me. That’s why I am searching. Also, that’s why I am so bugged by stupid unintelligent responses like many of the ones below.

20 04 2011
Grettgirl

Part I: How come people are not intelligently addressing what was presented? It shows lack of intelligence 2 personally attack instead of addressing some of these claims. As one who’s searching, I find it much more convincing 2 listen 2 intelligent ideas than 2 listen 2 personal attacks. In politics, politicians fall back on personal attacks when they’re cornered or can’t defend their positions. Is it the same 4 science? It seems that the debates on ID and Evo seem to follow that pattern.

20 04 2011
YutubeIsForDumbfucks

@GsliMaIiy haha read that nerd ass virgin like a book. lol🙂

20 04 2011
Jessewb

@shannon123933 I’m an evolutionist if you weren’t able to catch that.
and by no means does that prove or disprove a God,merely a few religions.. true, but not the concept of god.
if there is a beginning, there is a god, because to cause a beginning, you need to br timeless(eternal), and if you are the 1st cause, by indirect intervention, you are the cause of everything. that’s god, be it conscious, unconscious, evil, benign. it doesn’t matter, if you dont like it. oh well.

20 04 2011
Tealblueocean

This design is soo amazing!!! I can’t wait to try it, my nails r 2 short atm tho😦 thanks!

20 04 2011
Anivishta

Perfect! I cant wait to try this design!
Thank you for your wonderful ideas!

20 04 2011
nuttycookie7

instead of using dotting tools and stuff can u use nail art pens??

20 04 2011
1221amna1221

nice,but im feeling its little hard to me because im beginner

20 04 2011
1221amna1221

so nice

20 04 2011
live4love86

I did this design last night and it looks GREAT!! I have gotten so many compliments already and it’s barely been 24 hours lol… LOVE iT!

20 04 2011
gigiyo78

i love your design but just want to ask where do you get those dotting tools?

20 04 2011
03lenn

wish i have nail like yours!!!!!!

cuz my nail don’t live long , they die lol!!!!

20 04 2011
letaj81

I LOVE THIS DESIGN ! I ATTEMPTED IT BUT I DID IT IN GOLD COULDN’T FIND THAT YELLOW.

20 04 2011
Pu3pPyStYle

what products do you use? which company are they?

20 04 2011
puppylover8896

O my goodnesss! How do u get ur nails so long and paint your nails soo pretty!!??!!

20 04 2011
Sumieika

I’m both handed, so left or right .. dosent bother me🙂

20 04 2011
julene21

I love your videos…You make the hardest art look super easy lol So cool

20 04 2011
rosasbacci

so beautiful!!!!!!!!

20 04 2011
yahommi1

wow that’s beautiful ♥♥ best nail art yet

20 04 2011
MzSanchez87

” OMG ” Love these….

20 04 2011
meldaa67

very beautiful i try it …..NOW😛❤

21 04 2011
ohcomeu2

I LOVE IT SO PRETTY but 11 min to do one nail D: BUT STILL SO PREETY I LOVE THIS DESIGN

21 04 2011
malaka763

check out my nail art video pleaseee !!!! thanks🙂

21 04 2011
tinkerbellerin1998

i love those nails! they look amazing and your nails are sooo long wow!

21 04 2011
melissalynn97

pretty

21 04 2011
Heidi3242

Buenas tardes. Fuera calidad que le pusieran traducción

21 04 2011
loryciub

WONDERFULY

21 04 2011
deeray126

sexxxxiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

21 04 2011
forevernails81

Wonder how long did it take her to do all her fingernails?




%d bloggers like this: